Read this First-> Agenda 21: Coming to your community
 

What is Agenda 21 & Sustainable Development?

It is not an imagined conspiracy, Agenda 21 is a UN published plan for control of all aspects of human life.

The United Nations Agenda 21 was signed by the United States in 1992 and 14 years later, most people are still in the dark. Even though you probably have not heard of Agenda 21, it  is being implemented using terms such as "sustainable development" and "smart growth" in local communities across the U.S.  The sustainable development plan is lifted directly from the UN Agenda 21 document.  The terms sound great until you dig a little deeper.

Agenda 21 is a 40 chapter document listing goals to be achieved globally. It is the global plan to change the way we live, eat, learn and communicate because we must "save the earth."  Its regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation - even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people. Rather than saving the earth, it will place all humans who are not part of the ruling elite into the status of controlled servitude to the government.  This means total reliance on the government to provide everything you need to live.  Historically, this has never worked very well in practice. This socialist approach creates a downward spiral of society when individuals, freedom, and rights are considered less and less important and are seen as barriers to "progress for the masses."

Watch Agenda 21 Videos

Political Personality Disorder (PPD)

We here in the U.S. have a tendency to not want to believe that our political leaders would engage in actions that would hurt the national interests of the U.S.  That's because we wrongfully assume that they hold the same value systems as ordinary Americans.  Politicians, by their very nature, are people who actively seek control of others.  They simply have different motivations than the average citizen.  Many politicians want us to believe that they are always the smartest person in the room.  They crave that label and the attention it brings when they have control.  Taken to the logical conclusion, these people have a personality disorder that allows them to justify their belief system.  It is in their best interest to keep American's fearful, confused and poor to allow and increase their control of society. They want to be seen as having the answers and control to solve all our problems.  Decades ago, when there was less socialist intervention, families helped families, neighbors helped neighbors, and communities responded to need.  Standards of behavior were set not by government direction, but by simple exhibition of good citizenship by good people doing good things and this standard was passed from generation to generation.  Now we find that the more we rely on government, the less we rely on each other.  And that suits the socialist agenda. 

Agenda 21 Socialist Principles

Why does the UN use socialist principles for Agenda 21?  First lets consider that while the United States is a relatively young country, it is the oldest democratic republic.  Most other UN Member Nations are either Socialist, Semi-Socialist, Communist or Dictatorships.  This results in a large majority "acceptance and consensus" for the use of Socialist principles as the normal and natural course of action.  Our system of a representational republic, capitalism, supply & demand and individual choices and freedoms does not claim to be perfect, however, Socialists claim their system is perfect, with them on top.  History show us that Socialism has never worked as advertised, except for the ruling elite.

Socialism punishes success

If you watch the news frequently, you will remember having seen many reports about two of the most successful American Corporations - Microsoft and Wal-Mart.  Socialist attempt, through government intervention, to control them and bring them down.  They fear American success stories that, in their world view, are not government generated and serves as proof of the superiority of capitalism over socialism.  Wal-Mart started as a single small store in Arkansas and Microsoft started in a garage in Seattle.  Theses companies succeed by hard work and individual innovation that is rewarded in a capitalist environment and punished in a socialist society.  This corrupt ideal works on a global scale also.  Through initiatives such as the United Nations Agenda 21, Socialist governments seek to change our republic to a government-dependency model simply because America's success, through individual effort, proves that their system does not work.  They seek to eliminate our form of government so their people will not see a better way.

We have nothing to use but fear itself

Use of fear - manufactured crisis and use of real crises.  Rob Emanuel, President Obama's White House Chief of Staff, recently told news reporters that you "never waste a crises", you use it to promote and implement your agenda.  Which is why, while we are in a banking crises, President Obama, promotes a cause and cure that focuses on government provided health care, education and a policy of "renewable energy" sources that taxes the use of conventional energy. Taxes to be paid by you in higher energy prices.  This of course will cause the crisis to continue longer than it would have if left to normal market forces, providing more time to implement government control over more and more aspects of our lives. 

Prior to the economic crisis, the fear-of-the-day was global warming.  This term is no longer in use since over the past ten years the earth has not warmed even one-tenth of one degree.  So the new fear term is "global climate change" which, like global warming before it has no scientific basis.  You will soon hear that everything bad is the result of human activity, but without any real proof.  If it gets colder, its your fault, however if it get warmer, well that will be your fault too.  Obviously government must step in to save you from yourself. And that is EXACTLY what Agenda 21 seeks to do.

Surrender of sovereign and individual rights

Agenda 21 uses a United Nations consensus to override national sovereignty.  Agenda 21 states that one of its purposes is to equalize resources to help poor countries. First, ask you self, Why are they poor?  The answer is they have socialist and dictator forms of corrupt governments and not because we have taken anything from them.  Their own leaders keep them poor and under strict control so they can stay in power. You are already a "global worker".  The bank bailout of the stimulus package of 2009 gave thirty-billion dollars of your future tax dollars to European Banks while the socialist governments in those countries contributed nothing.  Why?  Because their socialist system could not support it.

Dependence not Independence

There is no other nation on the face of the earth that has citizens who individually give more to charities and relief organizations than America. Through individual private donations, American citizens provide over 500 times more private relief efforts at home and overseas, than any other country.  Socialist governments don't like this, they want the government to decide which charities and relief organizations are "worthy" to receive funding - only those that agree with them.  If you look at charitable giving by members of congress, you will find that those who support more government control are the ones who give the least of their personal money to charities, but seek the most control over government giving.  In other words they are most generous with other people's money (taxes) when it comes to giving to those who support their views.  Socialism seeks to take as much from their citizens as possible so that little is left for independent and individual giving.  By this tactic they gain more control of society by increasing dependence on government.

Local Agenda 21

Agenda 21 is not limited to nations.  It is being established in many communities across the US.  In their own words:

"Local Agenda 21 is a local-government-led, community-wide, and participatory effort to establish a comprehensive action strategy for environmental protection, economic prosperity and community well-being in the local jurisdiction or area. This requires the integration of planning and action across economic, social and environmental spheres. Key elements are full community participation, assessment of current conditions, target setting for achieving specific goals, monitoring and reporting."

Agenda 21, the UN blueprint for global transformation, sounds good to many well meaning people. Drafted for the purpose of creating "sustainable societies", it has been welcomed by nations around the world. Political, cultural, and media leaders have embraced its alluring visions of social justice and a healthy planet. They hide the lies behind its doomsday scenarios and fraudulent science. Relatively few consider the contrary facts and socialist agenda.

After all, what could be wrong with preserving resources for the next generation? Why not limit consumption and reduce energy use? Why not abolish poverty and establish a global welfare system to train parents, monitor intolerance, and meet all our needs? Why not save the planet by trading cars for bikes, an open market for "self-sustaining communities," and single dwellings for dense "human settlements"  where everyone would dialogue, share common ground, and be equal?

The answer is simple. Socialist economics has never worked. Socialism produces poverty, not prosperity. Collectivism creates oppression, not freedom.  This agenda may already be driving your community as "development", so be alert to the clues. Notice buzzwords such as "visioning," "partners," and "stakeholders."  As North Carolina school superintendent Jim Causby said at a 1994 international model school conference, "We have actually been given a course in how not to tell the truth. You've had that course in public relations where you learn to put the best spin on things."

The United States' voluntary compliance with this global contract binds the US and other governments to the UN plan for changing the ways we live, eat, learn, and communicate - all under the noble banner of saving the earth.

Global Control of your neighborhood

Prepared by the UN Environmental Program (UNEP), the Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA) armed UN leaders with the information and false science they needed to validate their socialist global management system. Its doomsday predictions were designed to excuse radical population reduction, oppressive lifestyle regulations, and a coercive return to earth-centered religions as the basis for environmental values and self-sustaining human settlements.  The report stated"

"It is a [Christian] world view that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes in nature, a characteristic that became firmly established about 2000 years ago with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions. Eastern cultures with religious traditions such as Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism did not depart as drastically from the perspective of humans as members of a community of beings including other living and non-living elements."

Chapter 28 of Agenda 21 specifically calls for each community to formulate its own Local Agenda 21:

"Each local authority should enter into a dialogue with its citizens, local organizations, and private enterprises and adopt 'a local Agenda 21.' Through consultation and consensus-building, local authorities would learn from citizens and from local, civic, community, business and industrial organizations and acquire the information needed for formulating the best strategies."

This tactic may sound reasonable until you realize that the dedicated "Stakeholder Group' that organizes and oversees local transformation is not elected by the public. And the people selected to represent the 'citizens' in your community will not present your interests.

The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide suggests that Stakeholders select two kinds of people to serve their agenda: (1) ordinary people who don't have "a stake" in the old system and would expect to gain power by establishing a new political system, and (2) media, business, political, church, and education leaders who must be wooed and persuaded to promote the transformation within their sphere of influence.

All participants must embrace the collective vision of a "sustainable community". They must commit to pursue the three E's of "sustainable development": Environment, Economy and Equity referring to the UN blueprint for environmental regulations, economic controls, and social equity.

Meanwhile, following the plan, opposing voices must be silenced. "Implementing the 'sustainable agenda' requires marginalizing critics," says Craig Rucker, Executive Director of CFACT, a conservative public interest group in Washington, D.C. dealing with consumer and environmental issues. He explains,

"Distinguished scientists who disagree with the globalist agenda are ridiculed and said to speak for conservative interests or industry (whether or not they receive industry funding) and their scientific arguments are never heard. Some of these marginalized critics are very distinguished scientists, like Dr. Frederic Seitz, former president of the National Academies of Science and a sharp critic of ozone depletion and global warming theories, Dr. S. Fred Singer, who help establish the satellite and balloon measuring devices to track global warming, and Dr. Edward Krug, who served on NAPAAP, among others. Some, like Dr. William Happer were even fired from their jobs questioning environmental dogma."

An American Solution - Alternative to Socialist Agenda 21

When all is said and done and arguments for and against Agenda 21 are completed, ask yourself:

Why do we need a United Nations Socialist solution? 

Where is the American solution? 

Where is the solution that continues and strengthens our belief in freedom and worth of the individual? 

Where do our leaders stand on Agenda 21? 

Can we not craft a plan that does not trample individuals and does not incorporate socialist changes in our government?

Do we need to ensure our environment continues to be healthy?  Of course we do. Consider the fact that the air and water in the U.S. is much, much cleaner today than forty years ago.  To "sustain" this progress, why must we change our form of government to suit Socialists nations, whose countries cannot show the same progress?

Further reading

Saving the Earth