Last spring I went
out to Chicago to see the Fair, and although I did not see it my trip
was not wholly lost--there were compensations. In New York I was
introduced to a Major in the regular army who said he was going to
the Fair, and we agreed to go together. I had to go to Boston first,
but that did not interfere; he said he would go along and put in the
time. His ways were gentle, and his speech was soft and persuasive.
He was companionable, but exceedingly reposeful. Yes, and wholly
destitute of the sense of humor. He was full of interest in
everything that went on around him, but his serenity was
indestructible; nothing disturbed him, nothing excited him.
But before the day
was done I found that deep down in him somewhere he had a passion,
quiet as he was--a passion for reforming petty public abuses.
He stood for citizenship--it was his hobby. His idea was that every
citizen of the republic ought to consider himself an unofficial
policeman, and keep unsalaried watch and ward over the laws and their
execution. He thought that the only effective way of preserving and
protecting public rights was for each citizen to do his share in
preventing or punishing such infringements of them as came under his
personal notice.
It was a good
scheme, but I thought it would keep a body in trouble all the time;
it seemed to me that one would be always trying to get offending
little officials discharged, and perhaps getting laughed at for all
reward. But he said no, I had the wrong idea: that there was no
occasion to get anybody discharged; that in fact you mustn't get
anybody discharged; that that would itself be a failure; no, one must
reform the man--reform him and make him useful where he was.
'Must one report the
offender and then beg his superior not to discharge him, but
reprimand him and keep him?'
'No, that is not the
idea; you don't report him at all, for then you risk his bread and
butter. You can act as if you are going to report him --when nothing
else will answer. But that's an extreme case. That is a sort of
force, and force is bad. Diplomacy is the effective thing. Now if a
man has tact--if a man will exercise diplomacy--'
For two minutes we
had been standing at a telegraph wicket, and during all this time the
Major had been trying to get the attention of one of the young
operators, but they were all busy skylarking. The Major spoke now,
and asked one of them to take his telegram. He got for reply:
'I reckon you can
wait a minute, can't you?' And the skylarking went on.
The Major said yes,
he was not in a hurry. Then he wrote another telegram:
'President Western
Union Tel. Co.:
'Come and dine with
me this evening. I can tell you how business is conducted in one of
your branches.'
Presently the young
fellow who had spoken so pertly a little before reached out and took
the telegram, and when he read it he lost color and began to
apologize and explain. He said he would lose his place if this deadly
telegram was sent, and he might never get another. If he could be let
off this time he would give no cause of complaint again. The
compromise was accepted.
As we walked away,
the Major said:
'Now, you see, that
was diplomacy--and you see how it worked. It wouldn't do any good to
bluster, the way people are always doing. That boy can always give
you as good as you send, and you'll come out defeated and ashamed of
yourself pretty nearly always. But you see he stands no chance
against diplomacy. Gentle words and diplomacy--those are the tools to
work with.'
'Yes, I see: but
everybody wouldn't have had your opportunity. It isn't everybody that
is on those familiar terms with the President of the Western Union.'
'Oh, you
misunderstand. I don't know the President--I only use him
diplomatically. It is for his good and for the public good. There's
no harm in it.'
I said with
hesitation and diffidence:
'But is it ever
right or noble to tell a lie?'
He took no note of
the delicate self-righteousness of the question, but answered with
undisturbed gravity and simplicity:
'Yes, sometimes.
Lies told to injure a person and lies told to profit yourself are not
justifiable, but lies told to help another person, and lies told in
the public interest--oh, well, that is quite another matter. Anybody
knows that. But never mind about the methods: you see the result.
That youth is going to be useful now, and well-behaved. He had a good
face. He was worth saving. Why, he was worth saving on his mother's
account if not his own. Of course, he has a mother--sisters, too.
Damn these people who are always forgetting that! Do you know, I've
never fought a duel in my life--never once--and yet have been
challenged, like other people. I could always see the other man's
unoffending women folks or his little children standing between him
and me. They hadn't done anything--I couldn't break their hearts, you
know.'
He corrected a good
many little abuses in the course of the day, and always without
friction--always with a fine and dainty 'diplomacy' which left no
sting behind; and he got such happiness and such contentment out of
these performances that I was obliged to envy him his trade--and
perhaps would have adopted it if I could have managed the necessary
deflections from fact as confidently with my mouth as I believe I
could with a pen, behind the shelter of print, after a little
practice.
Away late that night
we were coming up-town in a horse-car when three boisterous roughs
got aboard, and began to fling hilarious obscenities and profanities
right and left among the timid passengers, some of whom were women
and children. Nobody resisted or retorted; the conductor tried
soothing words and moral persuasion, but the toughs only called him
names and laughed at him. Very soon I saw that the Major realized
that this was a matter which was in his line; evidently he was
turning over his stock of diplomacy in his mind and getting ready. I
felt that the first diplomatic remark he made in this place would
bring down a landslide of ridicule upon him, and maybe something
worse; but before I could whisper to him and check him he had begun,
and it was too late. He said, in a level and dispassionate tone:
'Conductor, you must
put these swine out. I will help you.'
I was not looking
for that. In a flash the three roughs plunged at him. But none of
them arrived. He delivered three such blows as one could not expect
to encounter outside the prize-ring, and neither of the men had life
enough left in him to get up from where he fell. The Major dragged
them out and threw them off the car, and we got under way again.
I was astonished:
astonished to see a lamb act so; astonished at the strength
displayed, and the clean and comprehensive result; astonished at the
brisk and business-like style of the whole thing. The situation had a
humorous side to it, considering how much I had been hearing about
mild persuasion and gentle diplomacy all day from this pile-driver,
and I would have liked to call his attention to that feature and do
some sarcasms about it; but when I looked at him I saw that it would
be of no use--his placid and contented face had no ray of humor in
it; he would not have understood. When we left the car, I said:
'That was a good
stroke of diplomacy--three good strokes of diplomacy, in fact.'
'That? That wasn't
diplomacy. You are quite in the wrong. Diplomacy is a wholly
different thing. One cannot apply it to that sort; they would not
understand it. No, that was not diplomacy; it was force.'
'Now that you
mention it, I--yes, I think perhaps you are right.'
'Right? Of course I
am right. It was just force.'
'I think, myself, it
had the outside aspect of it. Do you often have to reform people in
that way?'
'Far from it. It
hardly ever happens. Not oftener than once in half a year, at the
outside.'
'Those men will get
well?'
'Get well? Why,
certainly they will. They are not in any danger. I know how to hit
and where to hit. You noticed that I did not hit them under the jaw.
That would have killed them.'
I believed that. I
remarked--rather wittily, as I thought--that he had been a lamb all
day, but now had all of a sudden developed into a ram
--battering-ram; but with dulcet frankness and simplicity he said no,
a battering-ram was quite a different thing, and not in use now. This
was maddening, and I came near bursting out and saying he had no more
appreciation of wit than a jackass--in fact, I had it right on my
tongue, but did not say it, knowing there was no hurry and I could
say it just as well some other time over the telephone.
We started to Boston
the next afternoon. The smoking compartment in the railcar was full,
and he went into the regular smoker. Across the aisle in the front
seat sat a meek, farmer-looking old man with a sickly pallor in his
face, and he was holding the door open with his foot to get the air.
Presently a big brakeman came rushing through, and when he got to the
door he stopped, gave the farmer an ugly scowl, then wrenched the
door to with such energy as to almost snatch the old man's boot off.
Then on he plunged about his business. Several passengers laughed,
and the old gentleman looked pathetically shamed and grieved.
After a little the
conductor passed along, and the Major stopped him and asked him a
question in his habitually courteous way:
'Conductor, where
does one report the misconduct of a brakeman? Does one report to
you?'
'You can report him
at New Haven if you want to. What has he been doing?'
The Major told the
story. The conductor seemed amused. He said, with just a touch of
sarcasm in his bland tones:
'As I understand
you, the brakeman didn't say anything?'
'No, he didn't say
anything.'
'But he scowled, you
say?'
'Yes.'
'And snatched the
door loose in a rough way?'
'Yes.'
'That's the whole
business, is it?'
'Yes, that is the
whole of it.'
The conductor smiled
pleasantly, and said:
'Well, if you want
to report him, all right, but I don't quite make out what it's going
to amount to. You'll say--as I understand you--that the brakeman
insulted this old gentleman. They'll ask you what he said. You'll say
he didn't say anything at all. I reckon they'll say, How are you
going to make out an insult when you acknowledge yourself that he
didn't say a word?'
There was a murmur
of applause at the conductor's compact reasoning, and it gave him
pleasure--you could see it in his face. But the Major was not
disturbed. He said:
'There--now you have
touched upon a crying defect in the complaint system. The railway
officials--as the public think and as you also seem to think--are not
aware that there are any insults except spoken ones. So nobody goes
to headquarters and reports insults of manner, insults of gesture,
look, and so forth; and yet these are sometimes harder to bear than
any words. They are bitter hard to bear because there is nothing
tangible to take hold of; and the insulter can always say, if called
before the railway officials, that he never dreamed of intending any
offence. It seems to me that the officials ought to specially and
urgently request the public to report unworded affronts and
incivilities.'
The conductor
laughed, and said:
'Well, that would be
trimming it pretty fine, sure!'
'But not too fine, I
think. I will report this matter at New Haven, and I have an idea
that I'll be thanked for it.'
The conductor's face
lost something of its complacency; in fact, it settled to a quite
sober cast as the owner of it moved away. I said:
'You are not really
going to bother with that trifle, are you?'
'It isn't a trifle.
Such things ought always to be reported. It is a public duty and no
citizen has a right to shirk it. But I won't have to report this
case.'
'Why?'
'It won't be
necessary. Diplomacy will do the business. You'll see.'
Presently the
conductor came on his rounds again, and when he reached the Major he
leaned over and said:
'That's all right.
You needn't report him. He's responsible to me, and if he does it
again I'll give him a talking to.'
The Major's response
was cordial:
'Now that is what I
like! You mustn't think that I was moved by any vengeful spirit, for
that wasn't the case. It was duty--just a sense of duty, that was
all. My brother-in-law is one of the directors of the railroad, and
when he learns that you are going to reason with your brakeman the
very next time he brutally insults an unoffending old man it will
please him, you may be sure of that.'
The conductor did
not look as joyous as one might have thought he would, but on the
contrary looked sickly and uncomfortable. He stood around a little;
then said:
'I think something
ought to be done to him now. I'll discharge him.'
'Discharge him! What
good would that do? Don't you think it would be better wisdom to
teach him better ways and keep him?'
'Well, there's
something in that. What would you suggest?'
'He insulted the old
gentleman in presence of all these people. How would it do to have
him come and apologize in their presence?'
'I'll have him here
right off. And I want to say this: If people would do as you've done,
and report such things to me instead of keeping mum and going off and
blackguarding the railroad, you'd see a different state of things
pretty soon. I'm much obliged to you.'
The brakeman came
and apologized. After he was gone the Major said:
'Now you see how
simple and easy that was. The ordinary citizen would have
accomplished nothing--the brother-in-law of a railroad director can
accomplish anything he wants to.'
'But are you really
the brother-in-law of a director?'
'Always. Always when
the public interests require it. I have a brother-in-law on all the
boards--everywhere. It saves me a world of trouble.'
'It is a good wide
relationship.'
'Yes. I have over
three hundred of them.'
'Is the relationship
never doubted by a conductor?'
'I have never met
with a case. It is the honest truth--I never have.'
'Why didn't you let
him go ahead and discharge the brakeman, in spite of your favorite
policy. You know he deserved it.'
The Major answered
with something which really had a sort of distant resemblance to
impatience:
'If you would stop
and think a moment you wouldn't ask such a question as that. Is a
brakeman a dog, that nothing but dogs' methods will do for him? He is
a man and has a man's fight for life. And he always has a sister, or
a mother, or wife and children to support. Always--there are no
exceptions. When you take his living away from him you take theirs
away too--and what have they done to you? Nothing. And where is the
profit in discharging an uncourteous brakeman and hiring another just
like him? It's unwise Don't you see that the rational thing to do is
to reform the brakeman and keep him? Of course it is.'
Then he quoted with
admiration the conduct of a certain division superintendent of the
Consolidated Railroad, in a case where a switchman of two years'
experience was negligent once and threw a train off the track and
killed several people. Citizens came in a passion to urge the man's
dismissal, but the superintendent said:
'No, you are wrong.
He has learned his lesson, he will throw no more trains off the
track. He is twice as valuable as he was before. I shall keep him.'
We had only one more
adventure on the train. Between Hartford and Springfield the
train-boy came shouting with an armful of literature, and dropped a
sample into a slumbering gentleman's lap, and the man woke up with a
start. He was very angry, and he and a couple of friends discussed
the outrage with much heat. They sent for the conductor and described
the matter, and were determined to have the boy expelled from his
situation. The three complainants were wealthy Holyoke merchants, and
it was evident that the conductor stood in some awe of them. He tried
to pacify them, and explained that the boy was not under his
authority, but under that of one of the news companies; but he
accomplished nothing.
Then the Major
volunteered some testimony for the defense. He said:
'I saw it all. You
gentlemen have not meant to exaggerate the circumstances, but still
that is what you have done. The boy has done nothing more than all
train-boys do. If you want to get his ways softened down and his
manners reformed, I am with you and ready to help, but it isn't fair
to get him discharged without giving him a chance.'
But they were angry,
and would hear of no compromise. They were well acquainted with the
President of the Boston and Albany, they said, and would put
everything aside next day and go up to Boston and fix that boy.
The Major said he
would be on hand too, and would do what he could to save the boy. One
of the gentlemen looked him over and said:
'Apparently it is
going to be a matter of who can wield the most influence with the
President. Do you know Mr. Bliss personally?'
The Major said, with
composure:
'Yes; he is my
uncle.'
The effect was
satisfactory. There was an awkward silence for a minute or more; then
the hedging and the half-confessions of over-haste and exaggerated
resentment began, and soon everything was smooth and friendly and
sociable, and it was resolved to drop the matter and leave the boy's
bread and butter unmolested.
It turned out as I
had expected: the President of the road was not the Major's uncle at
all--except by adoption, and for this day and train only.
We got into no
episodes on the return journey. Probably it was because we took a
night train and slept all the way.
We left New York
Saturday night by the Pennsylvania railroad. After breakfast the next
morning we went into the parlor-car, but found it a dull place and
dreary. There were but few people in it and nothing going on. Then we
went into the little smoking compartment of the same car and found
three gentlemen in there. Two of them were grumbling over one of the
rules of the road--a rule which forbade card-playing on the trains on
Sunday. They had started an innocent game of high-low-jack and had
been stopped. The Major was interested. He said to the third
gentleman:
'Did you object to
the game?'
'Not at all. I am a
Yale professor and a religious man, but my prejudices are not
extensive.'
Then the Major said
to the others:
'You are at perfect
liberty to resume your game, gentlemen; no one here objects.'
One of them declined
the risk, but the other one said he would like to begin again if the
Major would join him. So they spread an overcoat over their knees and
the game proceeded. Pretty soon the car conductor arrived, and said,
brusquely:
'There, there,
gentlemen, that won't do. Put up the cards--it's not allowed.'
The Major was
shuffling. He continued to shuffle, and said:
'By whose order is
it forbidden?'
'It's my order. I
forbid it.'
The dealing began.
The Major asked:
'Did you invent the
idea?'
'What idea?'
'The idea of
forbidding card-playing on Sunday.'
'No--of course not.'
'Who did?'
'The company.'
'Then it isn't your
order, after all, but the company's. Is that it?'
'Yes. But you don't
stop playing! I have to require you to stop playing immediately.'
'Nothing is gained
by hurry, and often much is lost. Who authorized the company to issue
such an order?'
'My dear sir, that
is a matter of no consequence to me, and--'
'But you forget that
you are not the only person concerned. It may be a matter of
consequence to me. It is, indeed, a matter of very great importance
to me. I cannot violate a legal requirement of my country without
dishonoring myself; I cannot allow any man or corporation to hamper
my liberties with illegal rules--a thing which railway companies are
always trying to do--without dishonoring my citizenship. So I come
back to that question: By whose authority has the company issued this
order?'
'I don't know.
That's their affair.'
'Mine, too. I doubt
if the company has any right to issue such a rule. This road runs
through several States. Do you know what State we are in now, and
what its laws are in matters of this kind?'
'Its laws do not
concern me, but the company's orders do. It is my duty to stop this
game, gentlemen, and it must be stopped.'
'Possibly; but still
there is no hurry. In hotels they post certain rules in the rooms,
but they always quote passages from the State law as authority for
these requirements. I see nothing posted here of this sort. Please
produce your authority and let us arrive at a decision, for you see
yourself that you are marring the game.'
'I have nothing of
the kind, but I have my orders, and that is sufficient. They must be
obeyed.'
'Let us not jump to
conclusions. It will be better all around to examine into the matter
without heat or haste, and see just where we stand before either of
us makes a mistake--for the curtailing of the liberties of a citizen
of the United States is a much more serious matter than you and the
railroads seem to think, and it cannot be done in my person until the
curtailer proves his right to do so. Now--'
'My dear sir, will
you put down those cards?'
'All in good time,
perhaps. It depends. You say this order must be obeyed. Must. It is a
strong word. You see yourself how strong it is. A wise company would
not arm you with so drastic an order as this, of course, without
appointing a penalty for its infringement. Otherwise it runs the risk
of being a dead letter and a thing to laugh at. What is the appointed
penalty for an infringement of this law?'
'Penalty? I never
heard of any.'
'Unquestionably you
must be mistaken. Your company orders you to come here and rudely
break up an innocent amusement, and furnishes you no way to enforce
the order! Don't you see that that is nonsense? What do you do when
people refuse to obey this order? Do you take the cards away from
them?'
'No.'
'Do you put the
offender off at the next station?'
'Well, no--of course
we couldn't if he had a ticket.'
'Do you have him up
before a court?'
The conductor was
silent and apparently troubled. The Major started a new deal, and
said:
'You see that you
are helpless, and that the company has placed you in a foolish
position. You are furnished with an arrogant order, and you deliver
it in a blustering way, and when you come to look into the matter you
find you haven't any way of enforcing obedience.'
The conductor said,
with chill dignity:
'Gentlemen, you have
heard the order, and my duty is ended. As to obeying it or not, you
will do as you think fit.' And he turned to leave.
'But wait. The
matter is not yet finished. I think you are mistaken about your duty
being ended; but if it really is, I myself have a duty to perform
yet.'
'How do you mean?'
'Are you going to
report my disobedience at headquarters in Pittsburg?'
'No. What good would
that do?'
'You must report me,
or I will report you.'
'Report me for
what?'
'For disobeying the
company's orders in not stopping this game. As a citizen it is my
duty to help the railway companies keep their servants to their
work.'
'Are you in
earnest?'
'Yes, I am in
earnest. I have nothing against you as a man, but I have this against
you as an officer--that you have not carried out that order, and if
you do not report me I must report you. And I will.'
The conductor looked
puzzled, and was thoughtful a moment; then he burst out with:
'I seem to be
getting myself into a scrape! It's all a muddle; I can't make head or
tail of it; it never happened before; they always knocked under and
never said a word, and so I never saw how ridiculous that stupid
order with no penalty is. I don't want to report anybody, and I don't
want to be reported--why, it might do me no end of harm! No do go on
with the game--play the whole day if you want to--and don't let's
have any more trouble about it!'
'No, I only sat down
here to establish this gentleman's rights--he can have his place now.
But before won't you tell me what you think the company made this
rule for? Can you imagine an excuse for it? I mean a rational one--an
excuse that is not on its face silly, and the invention of an idiot?'
'Why, surely I can.
The reason it was made is plain enough. It is to save the feelings of
the other passengers--the religious ones among them, I mean. They
would not like it to have the Sabbath desecrated by card-playing on
the train.'
'I just thought as
much. They are willing to desecrate it themselves by traveling on
Sunday, but they are not willing that other people--'
'By gracious, you've
hit it! I never thought of that before. The fact is, it is a silly
rule when you come to look into it.'
At this point the
train conductor arrived, and was going to shut down the game in a
very high-handed fashion, but the parlor-car conductor stopped him,
and took him aside to explain. Nothing more was heard of the matter.
I was ill in bed
eleven days in Chicago and got no glimpse of the Fair, for I was
obliged to return East as soon as I was able to travel. The Major
secured and paid for a state-room in a sleeper the day before we
left, so that I could have plenty of room and be comfortable; but
when we arrived at the station a mistake had been made and our car
had not been put on. The conductor had reserved a section for us--it
was the best he could do, he said. But Major said we were not in a
hurry, and would wait for the car to be put on. The conductor
responded, with pleasant irony:
'It may be that you
are not in a hurry, just as you say, but we are. Come, get aboard,
gentlemen, get aboard--don't keep us waiting.'
But the Major would
not get aboard himself nor allow me to do it. He wanted his car, and
said he must have it. This made the hurried and perspiring conductor
impatient, and he said:
'It's the best we
can do--we can't do impossibilities. You will take the section or go
without. A mistake has been made and can't be rectified at this late
hour. It's a thing that happens now and then, and there is nothing
for it but to put up with it and make the best of it. Other people
do.'
'Ah, that is just
it, you see. If they had stuck to their rights and enforced them
you wouldn't be trying to trample mine underfoot in this bland way
now. I haven't any disposition to give you unnecessary trouble,
but it is my duty to protect the next man from this kind of
imposition. So I must have my car. Otherwise I will wait in Chicago
and sue the company for violating its contract.'
'Sue the
company?--for a thing like that!'
'Certainly.'
'Do you really mean
that?'
'Indeed, I do.'
The conductor looked
the Major over wonderingly, and then said:
'It beats me--it's
brand-new--I've never struck the mate to it before. But I swear I
think you'd do it. Look here, I'll send for the station-master.'
When the
station-master came he was a good deal annoyed--at the Major, not at
the person who had made the mistake. He was rather brusque, and took
the same position which the conductor had taken in the beginning; but
he failed to move the soft-spoken artilleryman, who still insisted
that he must have his car. However, it was plain that there was only
one strong side in this case, and that that side was the Major's. The
station-master banished his annoyed manner, and became pleasant and
even half-apologetic. This made a good opening for a compromise, and
the Major made a concession. He said he would give up the engaged
railcar, but he must have a state-room. After a deal of ransacking,
one was found whose owner was persuadable; he exchanged it for our
section, and we got away at last. The conductor called on us in the
evening, and was kind and courteous and obliging, and we had a long
talk and got to be good friends. He said he wished the public would
make trouble oftener--it would have a good effect. He said that the
railroads could not be expected to do their whole duty by the
traveler unless the traveler would take some interest in the matter
himself.
I hoped that we were
done reforming for the trip now, but it was not so. In the hotel car,
in the morning, the Major called for broiled chicken. The waiter
said:
'It's not in the
bill of fare, sir; we do not serve anything but what is in the bill.'
'That gentleman
yonder is eating a broiled chicken.'
'Yes, but that is
different. He is one of the Superintendents of the railroad.'
'Then all the more
must I have broiled chicken. I do not like these discriminations.
Please hurry--bring me a broiled chicken.'
The waiter brought
the steward, who explained in a low and polite voice that the thing
was impossible--it was against the rule, and the rule was rigid.
'Very well, then,
you must either apply it impartially or break it impartially. You
must take that gentleman's chicken away from him or bring me one.'
The steward was
puzzled, and did not quite know what to do. He began an incoherent
argument, but the conductor came along just then, and asked what the
difficulty was. The steward explained that here was a gentleman who
was insisting on having a chicken when it was dead against the rule
and not in the bill. The conductor said:
'Stick by your
rules--you haven't any option. Wait a moment--is this the gentleman?'
Then he laughed and said: 'Never mind your rules--it's my advice, and
sound: give him anything he wants--don't get him started on his
rights. Give him whatever he asks for; and it you haven't got it,
stop the train and get it.'
The Major ate the
chicken, but said he did it from a sense of duty and to establish a
principle, for he did not like chicken.
I missed the Fair it
is true, but I picked up some diplomatic tricks which I and the
reader may find handy and useful as we go along.